<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Social Media Sites That Failed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infographicjournal.com/top-10-social-media-sites-that-failed-totally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infographicjournal.com/top-10-social-media-sites-that-failed-totally/</link>
	<description>Just Infographics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:07:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Quaid</title>
		<link>http://infographicjournal.com/top-10-social-media-sites-that-failed-totally/#comment-2430</link>
		<dc:creator>David Quaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infographicjournal.com/?p=12874#comment-2430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi David,

w.r.t to the infographic:
Google+ are bigger than twitter - ostensibly because they are backed by Google but also because its easy to use. You can access Google+ from Gmail, Apps, Youtube, in fact any Google signed-in Window, including Google+ and mobileGoogle+.

Both Facebook and twitter are walled gardens.

I dont see the comparison that Google+ is a Facebook competitor. I do however see huge problems for twitters 2013/14 IPO. 

You dont think that Google can unseat Facebook. Is this from I went forward 20 years and came back, &quot;I dont want it to happen because (tick where appropriate) [ ] I dont like google [ ] I have a USP selling Facebook predictions&quot; ? or something else?

I dont understand how people can put themselves in an ivory tower and tell people how everything is and should be.

As Google+ has rocketed past twitter in less than 2 years - even if it had only compared to twitter/fb when they were of the same age - its way ahead.

Google have done the impossible before: Unseated Yahoo, Bing (Live), Firefox, Apple iOS and massively displaced Internet Explorer, Windows O/S, Officeware, Hotmail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>w.r.t to the infographic:<br />
Google+ are bigger than twitter &#8211; ostensibly because they are backed by Google but also because its easy to use. You can access Google+ from Gmail, Apps, Youtube, in fact any Google signed-in Window, including Google+ and mobileGoogle+.</p>
<p>Both Facebook and twitter are walled gardens.</p>
<p>I dont see the comparison that Google+ is a Facebook competitor. I do however see huge problems for twitters 2013/14 IPO. </p>
<p>You dont think that Google can unseat Facebook. Is this from I went forward 20 years and came back, &#8220;I dont want it to happen because (tick where appropriate) [ ] I dont like google [ ] I have a USP selling Facebook predictions&#8221; ? or something else?</p>
<p>I dont understand how people can put themselves in an ivory tower and tell people how everything is and should be.</p>
<p>As Google+ has rocketed past twitter in less than 2 years &#8211; even if it had only compared to twitter/fb when they were of the same age &#8211; its way ahead.</p>
<p>Google have done the impossible before: Unseated Yahoo, Bing (Live), Firefox, Apple iOS and massively displaced Internet Explorer, Windows O/S, Officeware, Hotmail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wallace</title>
		<link>http://infographicjournal.com/top-10-social-media-sites-that-failed-totally/#comment-2422</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 19:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infographicjournal.com/?p=12874#comment-2422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I don&#039;t think Google+ should necessarily be grouped with the others although my guess if that the infographic creator is implying that they have yet to unseat Facebook and I don&#039;t think they ever will.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I don&#8217;t think Google+ should necessarily be grouped with the others although my guess if that the infographic creator is implying that they have yet to unseat Facebook and I don&#8217;t think they ever will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Dunn</title>
		<link>http://infographicjournal.com/top-10-social-media-sites-that-failed-totally/#comment-2420</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infographicjournal.com/?p=12874#comment-2420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah wait, I take it back. It is only the post that says &quot;Totally&quot; failed. The infographic has it right. My bad :-D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah wait, I take it back. It is only the post that says &#8220;Totally&#8221; failed. The infographic has it right. My bad <img src='http://infographicjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Dunn</title>
		<link>http://infographicjournal.com/top-10-social-media-sites-that-failed-totally/#comment-2419</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infographicjournal.com/?p=12874#comment-2419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David I think you need to reword this infographic because &quot;Failed Totally&quot; implies none of these networks were EVER successes which is completely false as evidenced by the many that showed multiple years of incredible traffic and success. 

I certainly disagree with Google+&#039;s dismissal because it fits a different mold and it is still growing and will continue to grow.

Other than that it looks pretty ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David I think you need to reword this infographic because &#8220;Failed Totally&#8221; implies none of these networks were EVER successes which is completely false as evidenced by the many that showed multiple years of incredible traffic and success. </p>
<p>I certainly disagree with Google+&#8217;s dismissal because it fits a different mold and it is still growing and will continue to grow.</p>
<p>Other than that it looks pretty <img src='http://infographicjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niklank</title>
		<link>http://infographicjournal.com/top-10-social-media-sites-that-failed-totally/#comment-2386</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infographicjournal.com/?p=12874#comment-2386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi David, I totally agree with this info in infographics, but I don&#039;t think so, that G+ failed. I am using G+ for promoting my business and I am getting not huge but handsome traffic from there. Its recently launched Google+ community feature is awesome and very useful anyway. Let see what other expert says....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David, I totally agree with this info in infographics, but I don&#8217;t think so, that G+ failed. I am using G+ for promoting my business and I am getting not huge but handsome traffic from there. Its recently launched Google+ community feature is awesome and very useful anyway. Let see what other expert says&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cori</title>
		<link>http://infographicjournal.com/top-10-social-media-sites-that-failed-totally/#comment-2368</link>
		<dc:creator>Cori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infographicjournal.com/?p=12874#comment-2368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google+ isn&#039;t necessarily a failure, as it&#039;s still going and it does have a considerable number of users. I think the issue is that laypeople think Google+ was Google trying to eclipse Facebook, but that&#039;s not the case. Google+ isn&#039;t about social networking, it&#039;s about adding a social aspect to the entire internet via Google&#039;s other pursuits. Ever heard of the Google search engine, Gmail, or Google Docs? They&#039;re kind of a big deal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google+ isn&#8217;t necessarily a failure, as it&#8217;s still going and it does have a considerable number of users. I think the issue is that laypeople think Google+ was Google trying to eclipse Facebook, but that&#8217;s not the case. Google+ isn&#8217;t about social networking, it&#8217;s about adding a social aspect to the entire internet via Google&#8217;s other pursuits. Ever heard of the Google search engine, Gmail, or Google Docs? They&#8217;re kind of a big deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: francesco</title>
		<link>http://infographicjournal.com/top-10-social-media-sites-that-failed-totally/#comment-2367</link>
		<dc:creator>francesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infographicjournal.com/?p=12874#comment-2367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[G+ a failure? LOL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G+ a failure? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
